Apply now

Research Scientist

Bellevue, WA, USPosted Jul 22, 2026
About Auger
Series BFunding stage
$150MTotal raised
17Open roles
$240,000Research Scientist median

Based on 134 disclosed Research Scientist salaries on Fast AI Jobs ($90,000$412,500 range).

01

Job Description

Build at Auger Auger is the autonomous operating system for supply chains — the layer that finally allows disparate systems like ERP, WMS, and TMS to work together instead of against each other. Most supply chain software surfaces problems and waits for a human to act. Auger solves them. Our AI detects disruptions, evaluates trade-offs, and executes decisions automatically — moving from signal to action in seconds, not weeks. We eliminate the Coordination Tax: the billions in capital and time lost when disconnected systems force the best people in the business to become the Human API between planning and execution. At Auger, we design autonomy into our systems. We expect the same from our people. That means: Clear ownership, not decision by consensus First principles over inherited patterns Shipping systems, not slide decks Fast feedback from reality, not opinions If you want to build, ship, and iterate against reality, Auger is for you. Auger was founded by Dave Clark and is backed by $150M from Oak HC/FT and Eclipse Capital. Headquarters in Dallas, TX and Bellevue, Washington. About the Team & Role The core of this work is training foundational models for supply chain expertise, not wrapping a generalist frontier model in a better prompt. We think a specialist model, trained deep on the domain, beats a generalist model on the problems that actually matter here, and gets us to a level of inference speed, cost, and reliability that routing every decision through a frontier API simply can't reach.   What Makes You Succeed Here We'd rather see your checkpoint get quantized, distilled, and forked into someone else's production stack than see it top a leaderboard for a week and disappear. A few things from The Auger Edge show up again and again in the people who do well here. The instinct to Explore to Evolve looks like this in practice: you don't just call .fit() on a technique, you can derive why it works, and you'll rebuild the pipeline from the tokenizer up when the domain demands it, whether that's continued pretraining into a knowledge-intensive vertical or an eval harness that measures something real instead of something convenient. If you've built evaluation frameworks specifically to catch what standard benchmarks miss, you're already living Own the Fall, Rise Stronger : you treat a bad eval run as signal, not shame, and the loop from "here's where it breaks" to "here's the next checkpoint" is short. The field dresses complexity up as sophistication constantly, which is exactly what it means to Crush Complexity here: we want the person who ships the clean dataset and the clean eval that a teammate can pick up cold, not the clever bespoke pipeline only its author can operate. Tech-leading through v1, v2, v3, each release measurably stronger than the last, is what All In, All the Time looks like day to day, and it's also why your job isn't done at a passing eval or a merged PR. It's done when you've watched the checkpoint run flawlessly in production, under real load, on real customer data. Ask anyone who's been here a while what that means in practice: the job is never actually done, there's always a v4.   What You Bring You've built foundational training data at scale, corpora and not just models, and understand that what goes into a model matters as much as its architecture. You've led a project across multiple release cycles, each one measurably better than the last. You've designed evaluation methodology that goes beyond standard benchmarks, built specifically to surface what those benchmarks miss. You've adapted general purpose models to specialized, knowledge intensive domains and understand what actually transfers versus what has to be rebuilt. You've created datasets that other researchers and practitioners now build on. You've taken research past the paper and into a real, end to end system that people other than researchers actually use. Recognition, best paper or outstanding paper or otherwise, has followed the work, but wasn't the point of the work. We're not hiring for a specific problem or a specific product. We're hiring for a pattern. If you read that list and thought "yes, and also," we want to talk to you. Auger considers all qualified applicants for employment without regard to race, color, religion, gender, gender identity or expression, sexual orientation, national origin, genetics, disability, age, or veteran status. Additionally, our privacy policy is available at https://auger.com/privacy-notice/ .